Group Presentation Rubric

 Rate each category from 1- 5

OVERALL ORGANIZATION OF PRESENTATION

7. Excellent Well-structured and presented in a logical sequence, used time wisely

4. Good Mostly structured, precise but parts may be unconnected to the rest of the presentation.

2. Fair Somewhat structured but too much time spent on unimportant material. Disjointed sequence.

1. Poor Unstructured, strays from the subject. Much of the presentation out of logical order. Goes over time limit.

COMPREHENSIBILITY OF PRESENTATION

7. Excellent Clear and easily understood.

4. Good Mostly clear but some confusion in the presentation.

2. Fair Somewhat clear but leaves the listener a little lost.

1. Poor Unclear and confusing. Not understood.

OVERALL PRESENTATION OF PLAY

7. Excellent Shows depth of thought.

4. Good Certain areas show depth of thought.

2. Fair Some understanding of subject but little depth.

1. Poor Shows a surface knowledge only.

USE AND VARIETY OF PRESENTATION MATERIALS

7. Excellent Presentation materials were high quality and useful.

4. Good Most materials were of high quality with some questionable sources. Some variety.

2. Fair Some material was of high quality.

1. Poor No presentation materials, or material that was inadequate or too small to see.

TEAM COVERAGE OF REQUIRED TOPICS

7. Excellent Each individual covered concerns raised by/through concept, as well as individual process. Personal experience was integrated where relevant and appropriate.

4. Good Most individuals covered concerns raised by/through concept, as well as individual process.

2. Fair A few of the individuals covered the material. Audience was left with minor questions.

1. Poor The team did not present the paper production in such a manner that the audience could follow or understand the process or the concept.